Nitrogen recovery and downslope translocation in maize hillside cropping as affected by soil conservation.

Publication Type
Journal contribution (peer reviewed)
Authors
Tuan, V. D., Hilger, T., Vien, T.D., Cadisch, G.
Year of publication
2014
Published in
Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems
Band/Volume
100/3
ISBN / ISSN / eISSN
1385-1314
DOI
10.1007/s10705-014-9657-2
Page (from - to)
19
Abstract

We conducted a field experiment on a 53%-slope in Northwest Vietnam using 15N-labelled urea to trace its fate in maize (Zea mays) under intensive tillage and fertilization (T1, control) vs. maize with Panicum maximum grass barriers (T2), under minimum tillage (MT) with Arachis pintoi as cover crop (T3) or relay cropped with Phaseolus calcaratus (T4). 15N-labelled urea was applied to one maize row at the top of each plot one year after trial establishment. At harvest, 21.6% of the labelled 15N were recovered by maize in T1, 8.9% in T2, 29% in T3, and 30.9% in T4. In T2, maize and P. maximum competed heavily for N with a total 38.1% of 15N recovered in barriers. Less than 6% of 15N applied was found in maize rows along the slope regardless of the treatment. MT reduced 15N translocation to deeper soil layers (40-80 cm), indicating a safety net function.  Less than 0.1 kg N ha-1 of applied 15N reached the collection devices at the bottom of plots; the majority of added 15N was intercepted by plants along the slope. Current farming practice (T1) induced a negative N balance of -142 kg N ha-1 in which residue burning and erosion were major pathways for N losses. Reduced N losses by erosion in T2 contributed to a less negative N balance as compared to T1. Positive N balances of MT treatments were associated with strongly reduced N losses by erosion and abandonment of burning residues, indicating a viable option for hillside cropping.

Involved persons

Involved institutions

Projects in the course of the publication