What a Difference Trade Makes - Export Activity and the Flexibility of Collective Bargaining Agreements

Publication Type
Journal contribution (peer reviewed)
Authors
Heinbach, W. D. / Schröpfer, S.
Year of publication
2008
Published in
Zeitschrift für Arbeitsmarktforschung
Band/Volume
41/2+3
Page (from - to)
287-303
Keywords
Handelsmodell, Tarifautonomie
Abstract

The prevalence of opening clauses in collective bargaining agreements may indicate a tendency towards a higher decentralised wage setting. Increasing competition on international product markets is assumed to be one reason for the decentralisation of bargaining. Current theoretical explanations focus merely on firm-level differences in the exposure to international competition. Unlike non-exporting firms, exporters are assumed to be exposed to international competition and are therefore in need of a higher wage flexibility. However, incorporating stylised facts about exporting firms, new theoretical trade models suggest that firms differ from each other in how they adjust to increasing competition depending on their export behaviour as a measure of productivity. While large, high-productive exporters expand into new markets, small, low-productive non-exporters are threatened by import competition. Based on a trade model from Bernard et al. (2003), we are able to explain verbally how a decentralisation of wage bargaining arises due to different labour demand reactions of exporters and non-exporters. In contrast to the result assuming differences in the exposure to international competition, we find non-exporters to be in need of a higher wage flexibility. As the introduction of opening clauses increases the wage flexibility at the firm level, we examine empirically whether exporters or non-exporters have a higher probability of using opening clauses. Based on IAB Establishment Data covering the West German manufacturing sector, our results suggest that firms exporting to EMU countries – but not exporters in general – have a lower propensity for using opening clauses than non-exporters.

Involved institutions

Projects in the course of the publication